Showing posts with label unions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label unions. Show all posts

Sunday, July 28, 2013

BART should get rid of this monster hiding in the name of Union and all of its Minions..

Even I feel like applying for job in BART.. I think, with my electrical engineering degree and my experience with world's biggest electrical engineering giants, I should meet their requirement.. The kind of salaries these guys are making is so great.. I slog so much and still they surpass me... and more over with super great retirement benefits..

Here is what BART management should do.. Instead of offering any pay hike, they should offer them two options:
1) Pay Cut of 20% in phased manner in next three years or
2) Get lost.. they should file for bankruptcy.. shut down BART for few months.. void all contracts and start fresh..

Given vested interests and fake pride of Unions, I think only second option will be the only viable option for Management. At the same time, management should also fire the executives who in first place made such contract three years back. Even they need fresh start. This is the tricky part.. Problem is that this bloody management also has vested interests.. They must also be getting similarly higher salaries.. No one talks about their salaries as compared to other transit agency salaries.. In general, in any organization, salaries are consistently higher or lower across the board..

Now, who is left to take care of interests of taxpayers? Politicians? Who unfortunately are pre-dominantly democrats and mostly funded and supported by these Unions.. What a mess.. Only for this reason, I am willing to vote for republicans.. any tom-dick-harry from republican.. but I will support them.. Even though, I primarily consider myself a democrat.. but in my view, democrats are becoming oblivious to interests of common tax payer.. and I think, it is mainly due to their consistent monopoly on California state legislature for such a long time.. I don't remember when California legislature was controlled by non-democrats.

So, bottom line.. in my view.. either democrat fix themselves or they will be wiped out from California's political map for some time for sure.. I know it may not be possible in next couple of years but I am sure we should see some kind of trend towards this..

Coming back to BART again.. This got to be fixed.. even if it calls for complete shut down for few days, weeks or even months.. and overhaul it and align it's cost structure with ground realities.. otherwise, they will be soon wiped from the very same ground..

I may seem harsh and angry.. but honestly, I am trying to control my language which I haven't done in past..


LABOR NEGOTIATIONS

BART leading the way on pay


Compensation for transit agency’s workers is far higher than their peers’ in Bay Area and the state


By Mike Rosenberg and Daniel J. Willis


Staff writers


While BART and its unions fight over employee pay raises with another strike looming in a week, a new analysis by this newspaper reveals the rail line’s workers already have bigger paychecks than any of their peers.

BART workers easily earned the most money on average last year among the 25 largest government agencies in the Bay Area, the newspaper’s review of public employee payroll data shows. What’s more, BART employees also topped the list of the highest-paid transit operators in California.

And the results are not close. Even when 
eliminating high-paid police officers and executives, the average gross pay for the blue-collar BART union workers who are threatening another shutdown was $76,551 last year — more than the average employee made at any large school district from San Jose to Walnut Creek, any county from Santa Cruz to Contra Costa or any transit line from San Diego to Sacramento. 

BART’s top-paid train operator grossed $155,308, compared with the $109,450 that the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority paid its top light-rail driver. BART’s best-paid janitor made $82,752 while the upscale Hillsborough City School District paid its top custodian $59,360. And BART’s electrician with the highest paycheck made $149,957 — nearly twice the $79,878 that AC Transit’s best-paid electrician made.

The wages are under heightened scrutiny as BART and its labor unions on Tuesday enter their final week of negotiations, hoping to avert a second shutdown, Aug. 5, after a cooling-off period halted a 4½-day strike earlier this month. Both sides remain far apart on the key issues of worker pay and contributions to pensions and health care.

Overall, BART’s average employee — executives included — made nearly $30,000 more than employees at Los Angeles’ transit line, and nearly $10,000 more than those at San Francisco Muni, the state’s second-highest paid transit workers.

BART workers argue their wages have remained flat for four years. They say they are worthy of their salaries, pointing to the agency’s strong on-time performance, high rider satisfaction and their work maintaining one of the nation’s most antiquated rail lines.

“You buy a Mercedes, you get quality. You almost get what you pay for,” said Dennis Acma, 47, of Dublin, a power support controller at BART for the past seven years. “They’re paying for that expertise. You got people who are dedicated that work here.”

Despite the lack of recent wage increases, BART has not had trouble attracting — or retaining — people to fill their union jobs, such as station agent, train operator and maintenance worker, that typically require a high school diploma and a few years of general work experience.

Since 2007, BART has received nearly 65,000 job applications for about 1,800 line-level union openings. Only 6.8 percent of BART’s blue-collar workforce left the job in the past year — half the average national turnover rate for public and private employers — and the typical union employee stays with BART for 13 years.

The data show BART pay is above average partly because of favorable rules that allow workers to pile up lots of overtime and cash out unused sick and vacation time, which has helped some employees double their base salary. But BART and experts say it’s also the result of previous managers caving to the public demand to avoid strikes by including regular pay bumps for decades, until 2009.

“(BART unions) have a degree of leverage from a strike perspective that many other industries don’t, and this is a classic example of them capitalizing on it,” said Christopher Thornberg, founding partner of Beacon Economics, a Los Angeles-based economics consulting firm. “If you ask me, it’s a tiny bit short of blackmail: ‘Give me the money or the commute’s going to get it.’ ” Union employees say the cost of living in the Bay Area has soared and BART’s revenue has surged to record levels. Plus, because of management’s push to increase health care and pension premiums, employees stand to see their take-home pay go down without raises.

And not all workers are highly paid. Last year, 830 part-time and full-time BART workers — or nearly one-quarter of the rail line’s workforce — made less than the $62,680 median income in the San Francisco-Oakland- Fremont metropolitan area.

Acma, the BART worker, said he’s tired of people thinking they are drones who only push buttons and said the employees work hard, often on off-hours, holidays and weekends, for their money.

“It’s unfortunate that our jobs do hold the Bay Area hostage,” he said. “We’re
 scrimping by, and sometimes the public treats us like we’re above everybody else. We’re not the 1-percenters.”

But BART says it needs to limit worker costs, which, as in most transit agencies, are the biggest expense in its budget. If overall compensation goes up, BART officials say, they will have to delay payments toward new rail cars and other equipment needed to increase
 service. Before state mediators earlier this month ordered both sides to keep their latest proposals secret, BART had offered a wage increase of 5 to 8 percent, depending on whether certain economic measures were met, over four years. That would push the average union gross pay to as much as $82,861 by 2017.

Unions had countered with a pay increase of 20.1 percent over three years, which would increase their average total pay to $92,991 by 2016.

The pay comes on top of the benefits BART workers earn, which are among the best in the Bay Area and
 have eaten up half the extra revenue the agency has collected in the past few years. Employees contribute nothing toward their pension and $92 a month toward health care.

“I don’t know if it’s an urban myth or just a saying, that the BART contract is held up in union halls around the county as the gold standard,” BART spokeswoman Alicia Trost said. “We have to bring our compensation packages more in line with what others have. Years of protecting the employees have caught up with us.”

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

RIP Margaret Thatcher

In my view, the best way to remember her is by this Wish:

"We desperately need you Mrs. Thatcher here in California!!" or rather.. someone like you.. Who can handle growing menace of all kinds of unions in California.. Be it Teachers Union..  or Police or Firemen or any damn union..

I wanted to write about Mrs. Thatcher for some time..  but was busy with other things.. well that is not excuse..  However, after reading this news on WSJ about her funeral service:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324493704578427961176489542.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsForth

I simply couldn't stop writing on her.. It was shocking and really disturbing that there are still some people (or better.. morons) in Britain who are opposed to her policy.. In my view, I think what ever is left of Britain today is because of her.. If it were not her policies, Britain would have been third world country by now.. Nothing more can be said..


Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Idaho Education Revolt - Teachers Vs Technology

In my view, news like these ones are one of the best example of how poor state of education is becoming.. I can't understand opposition to technology in teaching. They need to understand very clearly that technology is there is to complement them not compete with them. Leveraging technology, teachers should spend more productive time with students..

This clearly seems to be self interest of these teachers/Unions.. Change is only constant and they need to embrace it. sooner or later changes will come.. Instead of fighting with changes you better fight to adapt these changes.. First of all, I assume that all the teachers have above average IQ.. If that is the case, then they should be able to understand these Technologies and the changes coming with it. Let us say somethings are really complicated and they need assistance.. in that case they should fight to get those resources..

Instead of saying that "I fought for my country.. now I am fighting for my kids", these guys should really fight and embrace changes and technology coming with it..

Here are the details of news.. feel free to comment and let me know your views..

Idaho education revolt — teachers vs. technology


Shift to computers could change role of classroom educators


By Matt Richtel


New York Times


POST FALLS, Idaho — Ann Rosenbaum, a former military police officer in the Marines, does not shrink from a fight, having even survived a close encounter with a car bomb in Iraq. Her latest conflict is quite different: She is now a high schoolteacher, and she and many of her peers in Idaho are resisting a statewide plan that dictates how computers should be
 used in classrooms. Last year, the state legislature overwhelmingly passed a law that requires all high school students to take some online classes to graduate, and that the students and their teachers be given laptops or tablets. The idea was to establish Idaho’s schools as a high-tech vanguard. To help pay for these programs, the state may have to shift tens of millions of dollars away from salaries for teachers and administrators. And the plan envisions a fundamental change in the role of teachers, making them less a lecturer at the front of the room and more of a guide helping students through lessons delivered on computers. This change is part of a broader shift that is creating tension — a tension that is especially visible in Idaho but is playing out across the country. Some teachers, even though they may embrace classroom technology, think policymakers are thrusting computers into classrooms without their input or proper training. Some say they are opposed to shifting money to online classes and other teaching methods whose benefits remain unproven.

“Teachers don’t object to the use of technology,” said Sabrina Laine, vice president of the American Institutes
 for Research, which has studied the views of the nation’s teachers using grants from organizations like the Gates and Ford foundations. “They object to being given a resource with strings attached and without the needed support to use it effectively to improve student learning.”

In Idaho, teachers have been in open revolt. They marched on the capital last spring, when the legislation was under consideration. They complain that lawmakers listened less to them than to heavy lobbying by technology companies, including Apple and Intel.

Teacher and parent groups gathered 75,000 verified signatures, more than was needed, to put a referendum on the ballot in November that could overturn the law.

“This technology is being thrown on us. It’s being thrown on parents and thrown on kids,” said Rosenbaum, 32, who has written letters to the governor and schools superintendent.

In her letters she tells them she is a Republican and a Marine, because, she says, it has become fashionable around the country to dismiss complaining teachers as union-happy liberals.

“I fought for my country,”
 she said. “Now, I’m fighting for my kids.”

Gov. C.L. Otter, known as Butch, and Tom Luna, the schools superintendent, who have championed the plan, said teachers had been misled by their union into believing the changes were a step toward replacing them with computers.

Some teachers also have expressed concern that teaching positions could be eliminated and their raises reduced to help offset the cost of the technology.

Luna acknowledged that many teachers in the state were conservative Republicans like him — making Idaho’s politics less blackand- white than in states like Wisconsin and New Jersey, where union-backed teachers have been at odds with politicians.

Luna said he understood that technological change could be scary, particularly because teachers would need to adapt to new ways of working.


“I fought for my country. Now, I’m fighting for my kids.”


— Ann Rosenbaum