Showing posts with label government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government. Show all posts

Saturday, November 3, 2012

Silver lining of tragedy..

It is sad fact but universally true.. Tragedies natural or man-made do happen.. However, after every tragedy we have something new or better which simply couldn't have happened without those tragedy happening.. This news clip reminded me of same.. I was in dilemma.. whether to express my thoughts on it or not.. mainly due to another natural tragedy in east coast by Sandy. Honestly.. I feel that this subject is so prickly.. by writing this, I don't want to look rude and materialistic.


Couple of things gave me courage to express my thoughts on this topic.. There was controversy around New York Marathon.. which was finally cancelled.. but arguments "for" and "against" this event were loud and clear messages.. I could also express my views openly..

In this article below.. it seems that there is big change in attitude of Japanese youth in particular.. I hope it results in some kind of revival in Japanese economy which is shrinking for last two decades. There are some really interesting and innovative ideas being executed by Japanese youth and hopefully something great will come out of it. Hopefully it will result in great entrepreneurship which hopefully will take out Japanese economy from the grip of large multi-nationals who are primarily engaged in production and exports..

More importantly, it should hopefully change culture of workaholism to enjoy family and spending money in and outside of Japan. Hopefully, Japanese youth will take it as a message and work harder on stopping 3-4 decade long population decline ;-) Hopefully Japan will work on better economic and political relationships with its neighbors and more importantly with China.

Now, adding Sandy into this mix.. Agreed, it has resulted in big financial loss.. and it will result in significantly higher insurance claim payouts.. However, all these tragedies are boon to these insurance companies, who get more new enrollments which essentially more than compensates these claims.

Only thing, which is absolute loss in these tragedies is life.. There is no replacement or compensation for the lives lost... We can't even think about human sufferings and pains due to lost lives.. I am not good in expressing myself in this area so I won't even go near to this area.

However, despite all the difficulties and loss and pain in east coast due to Sandy.. there is upbeat tone.. about economy.. everyone is expecting revival of local economy in next couple of years and hoping for even more stronger economy.. a real solid stimulus to that area which will definitely percolate to rest of the country and even to global economy..

New York Marathon became controversial not because of health or any other sentimental benefits.. or loss... at stake was simple 340 million dollars for local economy.. The number which was calculated by economists.. that New York City/State will benefit around 340 million dollars from the event.. Finally, human pain and suffering was weighed more than 340 million USD..

I was told by someone long time ago.. US has only (or let us say significantly) grown when either of these two things happen:


  1. There is stalemate in Washington DC.. i.e. Government is totally ineffective.. 
  2. During/After War or some other tragedy of National scale.. 
Off-course, it grows at fastest rate when both of the conditions are met together at same time..

There is gridlock in DC.. Which will hopefully continue as Obama is more or less sure to be back for second term. Sandy stamped his tenure extension.. I am sure Congress/Senate will still dominated by republicans. That should ensure this stalemate to continue. We are wrapping up war and hopefully finish it by 2013... at the same time Sandy is going to create mini stimulus to economy.. which all together should create perfect conditions for US economic revival.. That is the real silver lining which I am talking about!!!!  



AFTER THE 2011 EARTHQUAKE

Young entrepreneurs seize the day in Japan


Psychological aftershocks trigger new urgency among young professionals


By John Boudreau


 


TOKYO — Before last year’s devastating earthquake, college student Tatsunori Hirota envisioned a life as a “salaryman,” one of the nation’s countless tradition-bound corporate foot soldiers in white shirts and black slacks who fill the city’s subways every morning and night commuting to and from nondescript offices.

But the psychological aftershocks of the disaster have created a new sense of urgency among a small but growing number of young professionals and college students like Hirota. They are abandoning the path of the corporate salaryman to chart their own way by launching tech startups and connecting to Silicon Valley.

“We lost family,” said Hirota, a Tokyo University economics student who, after the magnitude 9.0 quake, began studying programming and cofounded an e-learning website, Mana.bo, that received positive feedback from Silicon Val­
ley venture capitalists after he visited the Bay Area over the summer. 



LIPO CHING/STAFF PHOTOS

HEALING:
 From left, Ken Iwasaki, Emi Tamaki and Masaaki Sugimoto of H2L created a device to deal with hand injuries.





HELPING:

Dan Nagayama, above left, and Sid Umeda founded Dennoo, a measurable advertising platform.





EDUCATING:

Tokyo economics student Tatsunori Hirota, left, co-founded the e-learning website Mana.bo.


“We felt death closer than before,” he said. “Now we don’t want to work for the big company. We want to work for ourselves. The biggest risk is that something could happen to you before you do something you really love. It could happen anytime, anywhere.” 

Seismic shift 

The shift in attitude comes as Japan’s technology sector, once a rival of Silicon Valley, struggles to remain relevant in a global economy that is leaving it behind. Observers say Japan’s inward-looking and risk-averse culture has for years dampened the nation’s entrepreneurial spirit. In its 2010 report, the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor ranked Japan lowest among advanced economies in terms of attitudes toward launching new businesses. It noted that Japanese were the least likely to consider becoming entrepreneurs. 

In the aftermath of the earthquake and tsunami, which cost some 16,000 lives and triggered widespread power outages and radioactive leaks from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, there was a “shattering of trust in big institutions” across Japanese society, said Phil Libin, CEO of Mountain View-based Evernote, a provider of note-taking and archiving technology that has operations in Tokyo. 

That collapse of faith extended to large tech companies, many of which have broken with long-held promises of lifelong employment with mass layoffs. 

“The younger generation — their parents are getting fired from the big companies,” said Nobuyasu Kondo, an executive with Tokyo-based GNT, a Japanese mobile and gaming platform. “They realize if you work for the big company, you can still get fired. So why not take a risk and start your own company?” 

At the same time, Japanese realize their nation’s future prosperity and economy, surpassed recently by China as the world’s second-largest economy, is vulnerable in the global market, said Ted Yamamoto, a general partner at UTEC, a venture firm tied to Tokyo University whose mission is modeled after Stanford University, which long has fostered tech entrepreneurship among faculty and students. 

“It’s obvious the Japanese market is shrinking,” he said. “The population is shrinking. You bypass Japan to go to China and India.” 

Government officials, academics and industry leaders say that if the nation is to regain its technological mojo, it needs to jump-start an entrepreneurial culture, and that includes tapping into Silicon Valley. 

“To come to Silicon Valley, that is the dream of many startup companies and entrepreneurs in Japan,” said Yukiko Pollard, general manager of Tokyobased image processing software company Morpho, which opened a San Jose office this year. 

But young Japanese entrepreneurs face daunting obstacles. In Japan, there is nothing resembling the entrepreneurial ecosystem of Silicon Valley. And while companies like Mana. bo are able to tap into venture capital here for initial startup funding, there is a dearth of investors willing to spend the larger sums needed to fund deep research and development to prepare startups for the global market, experts say. 

“In Silicon Valley, you can get $20million (in startup funding) without owning a suit. In Japan, it’s much harder to raise money,” said Evernote’s Libin, a big fan of Japanese technological prowess looking to make investments in the country. 

Most Japanese entrepreneurs have no ties to Silicon Valley. Unlike Chinese and Indians, relatively few Japanese venture abroad for studies. Last fall, a mere 54 students from Japan were enrolled at Stanford, while 757 Chinese and 488 Indian students were on campus. So Japanese are far less likely to know people embedded in Silicon Valley’s startup culture. 

Beyond Japan 

But that’s changing as Japanese, from school students to young professionals, look beyond their borders for study and careers. And at home, there has been an upsurge in interest in learning English in a society that previously saw no need to speak languages other than Japanese, observers say. “Our embassy just put on a college expo and I can’t tell you the number of students who came up to me and said, ‘I would like to study at Stanford,’” said U.S. Ambassador to Japan John Roos, the former CEO of the powerhouse Palo Alto law firm Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, which works with many Silicon Valley companies. “We are seeing more and more of that — Japanese having an interest in going to school in the United States, connecting with the Silicon Valley. Everywhere I go now, there is a lot of this type of discussion.” 

For sure, there is brainpower aplenty in Japan, whose engineering brilliance has never been in question. 

“The creativity of the Japanese people is as strong as it has ever been,” said Allen Miner, founder of SunBridge Partners, a Sunnyvale venture capital firm pursuing startups in Japan. “The Japanese are as ambitious as ever. Pretty much every Japanese startup founder is thinking about how to create a company that will thrive for 100 years.” 

A sense of rejuvenation was in the air recently at an informal networking cafe established by a Tokyo University student. The cafe, which includes a large blackboard for brainstorming, acts as an informal think tank for young people looking for change. 

Emi Tamaki, 28, said she dreams of participating in a new startup culture in Japan, an area with a high concentration of startups she calls “Silicon Reef.” 

“I want to make many companies,” said Tamaki, co-founder of H2L, a maker of a device that can be used to rehabilitate a hand injury through therapeutic movements controlled by a computer, or to teach someone to play a musical instrument by directing finger movements. 

Issei Takino, co-founder of Mujn, which makes software that aims to revolutionize assembly line robots, spoke with the brashness of a young Steve Jobs: “We can change the world.” 

Contact John Boudreau at 408-278-3496. 




LIPO CHING/STAFF H2L’s Ken Iwasaki demonstrates the principle behind the company's PossessedHand system. 

Sunday, March 18, 2012

Is "Occupy Wall Street" movement a fraud?

Amazing news item in today's local San Jose Mercury News about definition of poverty in US and comparing it to rest of the world. Here are some striking facts about it:

 - As per US definition of "Poverty" family of four which makes less than $22K per year is poor
 - Fifteen percent of US population falls under this so called poverty line
 - This is all time high
 - Average income in Thailand is half of the poverty line definition of US
 - Poland's average income is almost same as US poverty line
 - India's average income is almost two third of US poverty line

Bottom line, Eighty (80) percent of world population lives below US poverty line standards. In US, anyone who can be qualified as "poor" as per US definition is eligible for safety net (Social Security, Medi-Care, food stamps etc..).

Doesn't this makes joke of this so called "Occupy Wall Street" movement.. These people better should spend their energy and resources to help rest of the world's eighty percent population. But why should they? that is not their problem.. and exactly that attitude makes them US a common target of hatred and animosity. Though this is general perception, I still feel it is more of jealousy. I know I am writing something which lot of people won't like.. but in my view that is the fact. US standard of living are higher than rest of the world and they have worked hard in past to build infrastructure and system for which they are reaping rewards. US has full right to define own standards of poverty.

Ultimately it is all relative.. Isn't it? I take India's example of poverty. Every time I visit standards of living are going up and so is definition of poverty. Which is exactly relative to progress made by the nation.. Though, I must admit that there must be many part or section of people who are still in same condition and progress hasn't reached them for a while. But it will percolate to all parts of society and population.

Having seen poverty standards of India .. Coming back to US. I feel all the charity work here is a joke. Personally I feel that there shouldn't be any need of charitable organizations in US. The level of progress and development makes it a joke out of charity here. In US focus should be to create jobs for these unemployed people. That will have much bigger impact than distributing wealth as charity. Jobs growth will enable government and other organizations to take care of so called poor and some really disadvantaged people.

But then, same is true for rest of the world.. Isn't it.. I am listening to slogan like "Gareebi hatao" (remove poverty) since my childhood in India.. Did it removed or made any progress. Instead it just created more corrupt society and enabled richer get even more richer by this social net. What if spending billions of dollars for this, we would have spent it on infrastructure to enable ease of business and creation of production facility.. that would have definitely made difference. Which is still true..

Well this discussion is endless.. but give it a thought and let me know your views..

====================



THE GLOBALIST QUIZ

Where do poor Americans rank globally?

The weekly quiz is provided by the Globalist, a daily online feature service that covers issues and trends in globalization. The nonpartisan organization provides commercial services and nonprofit educational features.

QUESTION



The Occupy Wall Street movement brought a fresh focus to poverty and income distribution in the United States. According to recent Census Bureau numbers, about 15 percent of Americans live below the poverty line, the highest percentage in 18 years. But how does U.S. poverty compare in a global context? We wonder: The Americans whose income is just low enough to be classified as poor, according to U.S. standards, are still better-off than …

ANSWER


A.
About 22 percent of the world population

B.
About half of the world population

C.
About 65 percent of the world population

D.
About 80 percent of the world population

A.
About 22 percent of the world population is not correct.

Those among the poorest 22 percent of the world’s population are incredibly poor by U.S. standards.

They are the 1.3 billion people who, according to new World Bank data, have incomes below what the World Bank designates as the absolute poverty line: $1.25 per day — or roughly $450 per year. There are just no such poor people in the United States. Although U.S.

poverty thresholds are differentiated by gender, age, place of residence, and other criteria, the average poverty line for a “typical” household of four is $22,400 annually. This works out as a little over $15 per day per person — or 12 times higher than the World Bank absolute poverty line.

B.
About half of the world population is

not correct.


People exactly in the middle of the global income distribution have incomes of less than $1,500 a year per person (adjusted for purchasing power), or just a bit over $4 per day. This is close to the average level of income in countries such as Cambodia and the Philippines.

Again, there are no such poor people in the United States or in the rest of the rich world.

C.
About 65 percent of the world population is not correct.

People who are near the 65th percentile by income in the world make about $2,800 a year per person (also adjusted for purchasing power). This is the average income level of people in Thailand. There are indeed some among the very poor in the United States whose incomes are about that level.

They are considered “extra poor” by U.S.

standards.

D.
About 80 percent of the world population is correct.

The income of those who are just sufficiently “bad off” to be considered poor in the United States is about $5,600 a year per person (or $22,400 for a fourperson household).

This is slightly less than the average income in Poland, and it makes these Americans better- off than about 80 percent of the world population, according to economist Branko Milanovic, author of a recent book on global income distribution, “The Haves and the Have-Nots.” The poorest Americans benefit from a social safety net that the vast majority of the world’s poor must do without.

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Local Government Crisis in America

It is amazing to see almost zero coverage in media about crisis in local / small governments in US. There is big crisis looming in every corner of US. It includes from big states like California to small city / county governments. I think these state and small governments employ around 8 Million people in US. This is excluding Education and Hospital jobs. This itself is more than two third of total government jobs.

So far these governments bucked recession as they were funded by Federal Government under stimulus programs. As Federal government didn't wanted these local governments also to start doing layoffs when rest of private sector America is doing it. They funded them with cash. Now, with economy coming back to track and stimulus funds vaporizing away, these governments are still facing huge deficits, as tax receipts haven't improved. As a result they are coming up different ways to cut costs. Primarily laying off their employees, cutting down on services and increasing cost of services where possible.. Biggest component is cutting down number of employees.

Will it fix their problem? I think that is going to worsen the problem. As all of these governments have very simple rule of laying off their employees... Performance.. are you kidding!!! that is probably last thing.. Only thing they have in consideration is Seniority.. So it is LIFO... Last In First Out.. Essentially they are getting rid of their so called least skilled and young man power.. Is it true.. I can't say..

Another of their biggest problem is unrealistic Pension plan.. Apparently, if you work 15-20 years with them and you decide to retire you will be getting almost 90% of your pre-retirement income.. What a great moronic plan.. I strongly believe that all these governments should file for bankruptcy and get rid of all these moronic labor contracts and start with clean slate. The kind of obligations these governments have is amazing. Whatever they do in their books to juggle it, ultimately it will come back to them.

Even though I am not republican fan, I do strongly support Wisconsin governor with his plans to get rid of unions for state workers or so called collective bargaining. This collective bargaining should be made synonym of Black-mailing. We need some very fundamental changes in Government sector jobs in US. It needs to run the way decent performing private sector companies run their business. Only performance is your job security.. Only performance is your growth potential... Only performance is your higher rate of income and thus savings in your retirement account..

After all this mess, if we don't fix it we will never fix it. There is decent public support for it.. In case of Wisconsin, their masses has given very clear mandate to their Governor to get rid of their bureaucrats.