Showing posts with label mini. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mini. Show all posts

Saturday, November 3, 2012

Mini lines for Mini!!!

This headline caught my immediate attention.. and details are also funny.. at the same time, they affirm my faith in Apple's marketing hoopla about online waiting lists and other sold outs. I strongly believe that even Microsoft is applying same theory for their newly launched surface tablet. I think it has become mandatory requirement for any product launch to declare that you are sold out within few hours of your online launch... or start giving your waiting list as 3-4 weeks.

Coming back to iPad mini.. I think I have wrote a lot about it in my previous posts. In my view it is great product except for two things:


  • High Price or I should say low value for money
  • Non-Retina Display


Price.. is relative.. depending on your valet size. But in general, media has hyped it so much that value for money factor has come in and it dead sure that by thanks-giving Apple will heavily discount mini. and I am assuming that those discounts will become permanent till next release or may be forever. I am hoping that it will be definitely $299 or below.

Non-Retina display will go away by Jan/Feb/March upgrade refresh cycle. Current Mini release was scheduled in Oct/Nov mainly for investors. Otherwise there wasn't enough growth for wall street. It was more or less catch 22 situation for Apple. Most likely, they simply didn't had enough retina display capacity for mini. Or it could be engineering requirement.. with resolution same as iPad2, there was relatively very less engineering needed on software/iOS side.

This holiday season, I think, even iPad4 price will be under pressure as Google launches Nexus 10 with $399 price. Let us see, how it goes.. I hope two things coming out of mini's launch..


  1. It has broken myth of Apple's product launch success. It is loud and clear message to Apple that customers are not going to buy garbage (sorry about this extreme term) for price of gold. 
  2. Increased competition to an extent that we will really see some great products in coming months not only from Apple but many other competitors. 

Google Nexus and Amazon needs to work harder and invest more resources in tablets and more importantly in OS (Android) and refine them to give better user experience and integration with different display form factors. I was literally disappointed with Amazon's Kindle Fire HD.

Enjoy this article...

DOWNSIZED IPAD CROWD 

The lines are Mini, too


Excitement is a bit more subdued than usual as Apple’s small-tablet entry carries big price



By Heather Somerville


 


PALO ALTO — The turnout for Apple’s release of the iPad Mini on Friday morning was — just like the new 7.9-inch tablet — noticeably downsized.

The early-morning lines outside stores in Silicon Valley and across the world were uncharacteristically short for an Apple launch, leading some to speculate that Apple fanboys and fangirls are growing weary of frequent and hyped product upgrades. Since the first iPad hit stores more than two years ago, competitors have emerged with 7inch tablets priced $100 cheaper.

Analysts project modest sales
 for the Mini this weekend, and for the fourth-generation iPad also released Friday. By 7:30 a.m. Pacific time, a half-hour before the Palo Alto store opened its doors, about 35 customers had lined up — a fraction of the number who scooped up the third-generation iPad on its launch day.

Brad Peterson, of Los Altos, was first in line at 2 a.m. When he saw the empty sidewalk outside the Apple Store on University Avenue, he thought he had the wrong day.

“I go to these things all the time, and (2 a.m.) usually gets me somewhere in the middle of the line,” he 
said. 



GARY REYES/STAFF PHOTOS

Christian Lindholm, of Helsinki, Finland, exits the Apple Store in Palo Alto carrying the pair of iPad Minis he just bought.





Brad Peterson, of Los Altos, holds a stack of iPad Minis and regular iPads he just purchased.

Peterson said he was surprised to be first in line when he arrived for the iPad Mini launch at 2 a.m.

Friday.


So he pulled out his third-generation iPad — one of about eight tablets he owns — to confirm the date, and with a quick Google search discovered that turnout was low at stores across the world. Reuters reported that crowds waiting for the newest iPad were smaller than for previous launches from Sydney to Amsterdam, with staff at the Hong Kong Apple Store appearing to outnumber customers waiting in line. 

Jeff Wang turned around and went home after he found the Palo Alto store deserted at 10 p.m. Thursday night. Wang, of Saratoga, came back at 2:30 a.m. to secure the second spot in line, bewildered that there weren’t already hundreds waiting by that hour. 

“The last couple of times I came around 11 p.m. the night before and the lines were long,” Wang said. 

Mike Smithwick, a San Jose app developer who waited toward the end of the line, suspected that some Apple fans had their fill with the first three releases. 

“I think everyone is lined out,” he said. 

The iPad Mini is Apple’s answer to popular 7-inch tablets like Amazon’s Kindle Fire and Google’s Nexus 7. But Apple priced its smaller tablet entry much higher than those competitors — the device starts at $329, while other 7-inch tablets can cost as little as $199. 

For some customers, the bigger turnoff is that the Mini is available only on Wi-Fi; the company will release a version that connects to cellular networks in a couple of weeks, when some expect to see an uptick in sales. 

Analysts doubt Apple will perform as well with this launch as it has previously, with Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster — an Apple bull who typically offers the highest projections for Apple sales — forecasting opening-weekend sales of about 1 million to 1.5 million for the Mini. 

BTIG research analyst Walter Piecyk said the sales total Munster predicted would be a disappointment. 

“We believe Apple’s first weekend sales of the iPad Mini needs, at a minimum, to top the 3 million first weekend sales of the iPad 3 in order to demonstrate that the management team can execute on ramping supply of new products and to provide some evidence that there is adequate demand for a smaller iPad at these price points,” he wrote in a note Friday morning. However, lower opening-weekend sales could help Apple avoid disappointing consumers. When the iPhone 5 debuted in September, Apple sold a record 5 million of the devices in the first weekend, but still couldn’t meet demand because of production delays. 

IDC analyst Ryan Reith cautioned Friday not to dismiss the Mini’s popularity because of short store lines. Many customers will probably order online, he said, and others will wait until closer to the holidays. 

Short lines didn’t mean Apple fans were short on excitement. The modest crowd in Palo Alto joined Apple staff with loud cheers when the store opened its doors two hours early for the event. Many walked out minutes later with a grin and two Minis — the limit for each customer. Peterson said the Minis were an early Christmas gift for his two teenage daughters — although he had a few hours to play with the tablets while the girls were in school. 

“December 25 is pretty arbitrary,” he said. “Apple decides when Christmas comes in our house.” 

More than a few New Yorkers can expect a Mini under the tree this year. About 600 fans braved the power outages, gas shortages and hobbled transit systems left by Superstorm Sandy to line up early outside the Fifth Avenue store, according to a Bloomberg News report. The New York flagship sold out of the Mini just hours after opening, and blogs and tweets indicated that a smattering of stores across the globe had sold out by the afternoon. However, it’s unclear how much stock the stores had to begin with. 

Friday was the first Apple launch event for Christian Lindholm, of Finland — the startup developer couldn’t resist picking up a couple Minis while in California on business. 

“I have to do it in Silicon Valley,” he said. “This is the store to do it. It’s the grandfather store; sort of in Steve’s hood.” 

Like others at the store, he owns a third-generation iPad — released just seven months ago — and won’t be buying the fourth anytime soon. Several customers said they were unimpressed with the upgrades and unwilling to pay another $499 to $699 just months after the previous version was released. 

Said Lindholm: “It doesn’t feel like a fourth generation. It feels like a 3.2. Staff writer Jeremy C. Owens contributed to this report. Contact Heather Somerville at 925-977-8418. Follow her at Twitter.com/ heathersomervil. 




GARY REYES/STAFF 

Apple employees greet customers Friday inside the company’s Palo Alto store. Far fewer people were in line this time than the hordes who queued up for the release of the third-generation iPad. 

Thursday, November 1, 2012

iPad Mini.. mixed reviews..

There are so many reviews of iPad mini. Mostly it seems great product, other than some dissatisfaction about display. I was happy with even original iPad and iPad so no personal complains. However, once you make your customers addicted to something better, it is difficult to reposition something older. There is/was bound to be that reaction.. Off-course.. Apple's product managers have to have jobs.. without roadmap of retina display in next release they will be out of job..

It will be interesting to see if they can continue to keep this price point. Especially, now Google Nexus 10 is almost in same price range.. Knowing Google, it has to be great product and it has potential to take away market share from both iPad and mini as well. $399 is really great price point for 10 inch tablet and within next one or two iterations it can easily be iPad killer.. We need it do well.. without that Apple is not going to reduce mini's price.. Though I have very strong feeling that Apple will do another refresh of iPad lineup sometime early next year. There is so much action in tablet area that they will have to abandon their yearly refresh cycle and move half yearly cycle..

As we can see with iPhone5 that Apple's quantum leap era is over. They have very few new and really innovative and disruptive ideas left. Apple is left with minor enhancements in processing power, speed and size/form-factor. Honestly, only difference between, iPhone 4S and 5 is screen size. Which, to be honest, I liked from 4S better. That doesn't mean that I am going back to 4S. I think it is just nostalgia.. I will get over soon. There were big differences between iPhone 4 and 4S.. but in my view nothing major between 4S and 5.

I think, iPad mini is going to be super hit any how.. or it is already.. but Apple really needs to work with major disruptive improvement in their current line ups. That includes everything.. Form factor is one aspect.. but they need another iPhone or iPad type of product. It could be software or hardware.. doesn't matter.. At the same time continue to focus on quality of their products and details of each aspect. They simply can't let that aspect go away.. I have been hearing and noticing a lot about quality degradation.. In short term it will not impact them, but if they continue this trend, they will soon become another microsoft..

Here is the best link from WSJ which summarizes most of the decent iPad mini review.. enjoy!!


This link summarizes iPad Mini's review:
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2012/10/31/ipad-mini-review-roundup/


iPad Mini Review Roundup




AFP/Getty Images
Does the iPad Mini outmatch the other smaller tablets?
The decision is in on the iPad Mini.
So far, reviewers across the Web have praised the size of the device, saying it is more comfortable to use and has an excellent build quality.
However, it comes at a price — a low-resolution screen that is more on par with the iPhone 3GS than the newer iPads, which pack a “retina” display.
“Ew, the screen is terrible,” Apple blogger John Gruber wrote, citing his wife — and saying his initial reaction matched hers.
Here’s the general consensus of reviewers around the Web:
Display
This is the chief complaint, but it’s to be expected given the downgrade from the current larger iPads. The iPad Mini has a 1,024 by 768-pixel display, compared to 2048-by-1536 pixel resolution in the larger iPads. “It feels like an iPhone 3GS display cut to iPad size, including the fact that the pixels seem deeper from the surface of the glass,” Gruber writes.
“Since Apple AAPL -1.44% is the company that’s gotten our eyes used to the hey-look-no-pixels trick of the Retina display, it’s hard to take a step back and not notice,”The Verge’s Josh Topolsky writes. “I don’t think the lower resolution is a deal-breaker in this product, but it is a compromise you have to be aware of. It simply doesn’t look as clear as other products on the market.”
“If you’re an obsessive over crisp text, you’ll notice the fuzziness,” CNET’s Scott Stein writes. “Yes, the non-Retina Display means text that’s less sharp. It feels like a disconnect on a device so clearly targeted at reading. Yet, hold the iPad Mini back a foot and increase the font size, and you probably won’t notice.”
Size
In contrast, the size — a few inches shorter than the traditional iPad — is cited as a massive strong point, making it feel more comfortable than the traditional iPad. “The Mini with the Smart Cover1 on is almost exactly as thick (or as thin, if you prefer) as an iPad 3 or 4 without a cover,” Gruber writes. “Combine that with the weight and it’s just plain fun to hold.”
In terms of app usage, ” 99 out of 100 times while using it, this wasn’t an issue, but it did take some getting used to in places,” Topolsky writes.
Still, the iPad Mini might be a bit too big to hold one-handed, writes Engadget’s Tim Stevens. “This editor, who wears XL gloves, had no problem palming the littler iPad, but when we handed it to other, dainty-fingered people they sometimes struggled to hold it securely. The scrawny bezels on either side actually exacerbate this issue to some degree, as those who must loop a thumb around the front of the device when holding it are forced to put that thumb right on the display.”
Build
“But the iPad Mini is a far classier, more attractive, thinner machine. It has two cameras instead of one,” writes The New York Times’ David Pogue. “Its fit and finish are far more refined. And above all, it offers that colossal app catalog, which Android tablet owners can only dream about.”
Still, the build of the device might be a little unwieldy with the Smart Cover built in, says Topolsky. “I actually had a little trouble holding onto the device when I wasn’t using the Smart Cover due to the back being as smooth as it is, and the frame being so thin.”
“Regardless of your feelings of the Mini’s price, or its A5 processor and non-Retina 7.9-inch display, here’s what you’ll notice when you pick it up: it’s really shockingly nice to hold,” Stein writes.
For reading
Given that it’s around the size of a Kindle, there will be some similarities drawn — especially when it comes to reading. “For reading, all of these apps work great on the iPad Mini. Font sizes on some websites can be a little small (tiny type that is legible on retina displays is just smudgy on non-retina ones), but most sites look just fine,” Gruber writes. “The Mini feels optimized for reading.”
Apps
While the price is a little steep, “The App Store is Apple’s great gold mine, and the iPad Mini’s price seems to be banking on you knowing that. And, in that sense, the iPad Mini may be worth its price,” Stein writes. This is pretty much what users should expect from Apple, since it’s a favorite among app developers.
Performance
The iPad Mini uses a chip that’s a couple generations old, and its specs are about on par with the iPad 2. Nevertheless, it still packs a punch, according to reviewers. “I’d say iPad 3-caliber performance in a $329 radically smaller device is pretty good,” Gruber writes. “I was not expecting iPad 3 performance in the Mini. But it’s there, and that makes the iPad Mini great for games.”
The trade-off is that it has a better battery life, though. “Apps do load more slowly but most are still up and running within a second or two and when it comes to general web surfing tasks the iPad mini easily kept up with our taps and swipes,” Stevens writes. “So, perhaps not the greatest performance in the Apple lineup, but there is one place where it bests the rest: battery life.”
The final verdict
Dan Gruber, Daring Fireball: For anyone else — those who own an older iPad 1 or 2, and those who have yet to buy their first iPad — the iPad Mini’s display will garner no complaints. I prefer the Mini over the full-size iPad in every single regard other than display resolution, and though I (and many of you) obsess over display resolution, it’s not an issue in the mass market.
Josh Topolsky, The Verge: The iPad mini hasn’t wrapped up the “cheapest tablet” market by any stretch of the imagination. But the “best small tablet” market? Consider it captured.
Scott Stein, CNET: If you want the full, polished Apple tablet experience in a smaller package, the iPad Mini is worth the premium price. Otherwise, good alternatives are available for less money… If the iPad Mini had a Retina Display, a newer A6 processor, and a slightly lower price, it would be the must-have Apple gadget of the year. Even without that, it’s still incredibly appealing. Its $329 price still makes it one of the least-expensive iOS gadgets Apple makes.
David Pogue, New York Times: Over all, the Mini gives you all the iPad goodness in a more manageable size, and it’s awesome. You could argue that the iPad Mini is what the iPad always wanted to be.
Walt Mossberg, WSJ: Every app that ran on my larger iPad ran perfectly on the Mini. I was able to use it one-handed and hold it for long periods of time without tiring. My only complaints were that it’s a tad too wide to fit in most of my pockets, and the screen resolution is a big step backwards from the Retina display on the current large iPad.
Tim Stevens, Engadget: This isn’t just an Apple tablet made to a budget. This isn’t just a shrunken-down iPad. This is, in many ways, Apple’s best tablet yet, an incredibly thin, remarkably light, obviously well-constructed device that offers phenomenal battery life.

Friday, July 6, 2012

iPad mini? Really?

I am big fan of iPad mainly because of it's form factor, display, graphics rendering and excellent user interface. This smaller iPad, may be needed to compete with Google Nexus 7 and Aamzon Fire tablets.. As per this article it is similar to iPod and iPod mini concept. To be honest, I never liked iPod mini as well. May be it is my own form factor which makes me like only bigger form factors ;-) I do love my iPhone and have never able to use my 7 inch tablet over it..

I hope that this new iPad mini turns out to be better experience than other minis out there. I would have preferred that Apple continue with their older versions at cheaper prices to cater for lower end market. That would give them broader spectrum in terms of price range but won't give them form factor spread. This form factor IS unique differentiation for iPad any how.. I don't know, why they want to loose it.. May be, I should do MBA so I can understand their strategy..

However, I very strongly feel that it won't have good impact on Apple in long term. It may in turn start eating their own market instead of growing it overall. Moreover, impact of content on smaller screen size will further diminish their iTunes/Cloud eco-system value. In short term it will definitely help them and I do expect some share boost if analysts haven't already factored iPad mini in..

What I remember from older days that Jobs was totally against smaller form factors.. I am still supportive of his idea of iPad's form factor. I still believe that new management is focused on Stock price and that is the reason for all the new product line introductions instead of focusing on details and quality of the products. It is too early to see the direct impact of shift in change.. I hope that this doesn't happen as I really love Apple for the value they create out of their products is amazing and quality is usually much better than similarly configured devices.







SHIFT IN STRATEGY

Apple eyes smaller, lower-price iPad


With 7.85-inch screen, mini device would be designed to block competitors


By John Boudreau


 


Apple may be on the verge of rewriting its iPad strategy by rolling out a smaller and less expensive model this fall, a move analysts say could further distance it from competitors already struggling to play catch-up.

A chorus of news organizations and analysts believe Apple is building an iPad mini — its display screen could be 7.85 inches instead of the current 9.7 inches — resembling the strategy it deployed for the iPod, in which the company offered digital media players with varying features and prices, including the low-end $49
 iPod shuffle.

That move blocked lower-end competitors from grabbing market share from Apple, said Creative Strategies analyst Ben Bajarin. “It shows Apple is not afraid to segment its products,” he said.

While no one knows for sure what Apple’s next moves are until they announce them, industry experts increasingly believe a smaller iPad is in the offing.

Investors on Thursday appeared
 happy with increasing speculation that Apple is preparing to sell a smaller iPad. Shares of Apple closed up nearly 2 percent to $609.94.

Apple is not going to stand still as more tablet competitors try to encircle it, said Bajarin, noting Google’s new move into the market with its Nexus 7, a 7-inch device that starts at $200. Microsoft is planning to roll out a series of tablets called Surface.

Rumors about the development of a 7-inch iPad have been around for years. The market, though, may be right for one now, experts say. The late Steve Jobs dispar­
aged a smaller-screen tablet in a 2010 conference call with analysts, saying it is too big to compete with an iPhone but too small to provide a good user experience. But technology and markets change, analysts say. 

Brian White, an analyst with Topeka Capital Markets, said there are a number of reasons why Apple would add a smaller iPad to its product offerings, including increasing its ability to tap deeper into developing markets such as China and taking a step to realizing Jobs’ vision of transforming the multibillion-dollar textbook industry by providing cheaper devices for K-12 students. 

“As you drop the price point and size, you are opening up consumers you weren’t addressing before,” he said. His firm’s research indicates a market exists for smaller iPads that sell for $250 to $300. 

White also believes a number of current iPad owners would be willing to buy the smaller model. Women, for instance, would like to be able to slip a slimmer iPad into purses while men could carry a smaller model inside sport coats, he said. 

“There will be some who want both” iPad models, White said. Although Jobs once inveighed against a smaller iPad, the Apple co-founder was known for changing his opinions, White said. And, he added, Jobs instructed CEO Tim Cook to run the company as he sees fit. And that could be shifting Apple’s iPad strategy. An iPad mini could cannibalize 10 to 20 percent of sales of the more expensive model, White said. But a cheaper iPad would also bring new customers to the Apple ecosystem, which frequently results in future sales of its other devices, observed Sterne Agee analyst Shaw Wu. “This would be a competitor’s worst nightmare,” he said. “They already are having a hard time competing with the current iPad.” Apple’s latest model starts at $499; its older version is offered at $399. A less expensive iPad would take away the price advantage of competitors, Wu said. Last year, Apple had 62 percent of the tablet market, according to IHS iSuppli. Overall, the tablet market is expected to soar this year to 124 million units, up 90 percent from 65 million in 2011, the market research company projects. 

Apple’s ability to stay ahead of competitors allows the company to sell high volumes of new products. This enables the company to aggressively price its products while maintaining large profit margins, Wu said. He estimates the company’s profit margin on the new Retina display iPad is a bit under 40 percent, whereas the profit margin on the older model is about 40 percent. Competitors, on the other hand, have profit margins that range from 20 to 25 percent on their tablets, Wu said. 

Apple plows its large profits back into research and innovation in a way other consumer electronics companies can’t, he said. “That’s what makes Apple so dangerous,” Wu said. 

Bajarin said Apple learned the importance of creating a dominant computing platform — from Macintosh computers to iPhones — after Microsoft’s Windows franchise took over the global PC market decades ago. 

“They are dedicated to doing that, and this is part of that strategy,” he said of a smaller iPad. 

Contact John Boudreau at 408-278-3496.